![]() ![]() This especially applies in cases related to sexual crimes, where evidence of defendants’ prior bad sexual acts is considered so prejudicial to the jury – making them more likely to convict regardless of the evidence of the crime they are in fact being tried for – that the correct ruling is generally to exclude that evidence.Ī more typical example of these evidentiary concerns arises when prosecutors try defendants for drug sales. Harvey Weinstein Gets 23 Years in Prison After Whining ‘This Is Wrong’ ![]() Prosecutors and defense counsel regularly wrangle over what information is allowed to be heard by the jury in a criminal trial. It is a well-established legal principle that prosecutors are not supposed to use the defendants’ character or character traits to prove that they committed the crime they are being tried for. Prosecutors are supposed to prove the crimes they have charged, using evidence that shows the defendant committed the crime at issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |